High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 62. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed
Get Price
Oct 03, 2017 On 15 September 2017, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of
Get Price
Jul 07, 2017 The high court verdict had come on a PIL of Haridwar resident Mohammad Salim over mining and stone crushing along the banks of the Ganga. ET Bureau. NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the controversial Uttarakhand High Court order declaring Ganga, Yamuna and their tributaries as living entities. The High Court had on March 20, 2017, declared these rivers as
Get Price
May 22, 2017 Matter also related to mining and stone crushing along the banks of Ganga Dehradun : The Centre has moved to the Supreme Court over the Uttarakhand High Court judgement to accord the
Get Price
Sep 10, 2020 Speaking to TOI, Dushyant Mainali, the counsel appearing for the petitioner said, “The Supreme Court guidelines clearly say that no stone crusher can operate within 10 km of a National Park. However, the said stone crusher is barely a few meters from the
Get Price
Supreme court judgement on stone crushers uttarakhand in 1991, the supreme court in its judgment expressed the view that childrens the case of stone breaking and stone crushing, minimum wage rates of rs learn more,himachal high court judgment on stone crusherupreme court guidlines on stone crushers africar-hirerusher act engf.i want to set
Get Price
supreme court judgement on stone crushers uttarakhand. LIST OF STONE CRUSHERS IN UTTARAKHAND YouTube. Oct 21, 2016 List of Stone Crusher Dealers companies, institutions, organizations, uttrakhand Schoolsguide.instone crusher manufacturer in uttarakhand. LSC Infratech Crushing Plants Equip with Innovative Technologies
Get Price
Uttarakhand Stone Products Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.347/Del/2009 of Bench 'H', New Delhi dated 26.04.2010 and M/s. Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers (I) Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.348/Del/2009 of Bench 'D', New Delhi dated 26.09.2011. He pleaded that the matter may be restored back to the Assessing Officer. 4
Get Price
May 15, 1992 Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass into the air, and due to pollution, lives of the people living in some parts of South Delhi, especially rural, and workers, their families living at the site as well as people living in the villages bordering Haryana were suffering from
Get Price
Correspondence The Registrar, Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 -24,23388942 FAX : ,23381584 e-mail : supremecourt[at]nic[dot]in
Get Price
1. This application has been filed in a decided matter to seek permission to operate a stone crusher in District Nainital, Uttarakhand. It is stated that vide order dated 17.12.2018 in O.A. No. 367/2016, Bahadur Singh Karki v.Union of India, the Tribunal prohibited operation of stone crushers within 10 Kms of the Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary, in view of Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
Get Price
May 21, 2017 The matter also related to mining and stone crushing along the banks of the Ganga. (Photo for representational purpose) The Centre has moved the Supreme Court over the Uttarakhand High Court judgement to accord the status of a “living human entity” to the Ganga river, citing administrative issues relating to the implementation of the order
Get Price
Feb 15, 2019 In May 2017, Central Government and Uttarakhand State Government appealed to the Supreme Court against the Uttarakhand High Court decision regarding granting the right of 'living entity' to the River based on the clause the grant is not implementable and is 'unsustainable in law'
Get Price
Supreme Court Case Status Karnataka Stonecrusher supreme court judgement on karnataka stone crusher karnataka stone crusher supreme court judgement karnataka road to nowhere jun in april the supreme court upheld two karnataka high court rulings it upheld the somashekar reddy judgment holding that the bmicp was an quot stone crushers
Get Price
Furthermore, Puran Ram did file an Application before the court below, which has been taken note of by the learned Judge while rendering the judgment under appeal. In that Application, he stated that the victim had stolen a sum of Rs. 89,000/- from the truck and, accordingly, he had a scuffle with the victim and, in course thereof, victim died
Get Price
Jul 05, 2017 On December 5, 2016, the Uttarakhand High Court had prohibited mining in the Ganga riverbed. In response the state government had filed a Special Leave Petition, and in May the Supreme Court
Get Price
Jul 07, 2011 The activity of converting boulder into grits/stone chips/powder may not be a manufacturing activity, but since such activity would be producing grits/stone chips/powder, the same would be production. CIT Vs Mallikarjun Geo resources Associates. High Court of Uttarakhand. Income Tax Appeal No. 33 of 2009. Decided on: 7 July 2011. Judgement. Per
Get Price
Sep 15, 2017 15/09/2017 Judgement of the Supreme Court of India in the matter of State of Uttarakhand & Others Vs Kumaon Stone Crusher dated 15/09/2017 regarding transit fee levied by three States (Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh) on
Get Price
Jul 08, 2017 The high court’s order had come on a PIL by Hardwar-resident Mohammed Salim regarding illegal sandmining and stone crushing along the banks of the Ganga. (Representational Image) The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the Uttarakhand High Court order according the status of “living human entity” to Ganga and Yamuna rivers
Get Price
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization. Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly
Get Price
Mar 20, 2017 Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel, for the State of Uttarakhand. Dated: March 20, 2017 Coram: Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma , J. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Per: Hon. Rajiv Sharma, J. Vide judgment dated 5.12.2016, this Court had issued the following mandatory directions to the respondents: - “1. Respondent nos. 3 to 7 are directed to evict
Get Price
